Which statement correctly states how a warrant must be authorized?

• A. Must be issued by a police officer
• B. Must be authorized by a judge in writing
• C. Must be approved by a cousin in law enforcement
• D. Must be endorsed by a clerk

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that a warrant is approved through neutral judicial oversight and in written form. A warrant must be issued by a judge or magistrate after reviewing an affidavit that shows probable cause—that there is a reasonable basis to believe evidence of a crime is at a specific location. The written order then precisely defines what is to be searched and what can be seized, and it includes any time limits for execution. This written, judicial authorization provides accountability, protects constitutional rights, and gives officers a lawful, reviewable basis for action.

That’s why this statement fits best: only a judge in writing can authorize a warrant. A police officer can request and present the probable cause, but cannot grant the warrant themselves. A cousin in law enforcement or a clerk does not provide the required neutral judicial decision or written authorization.